AI

LLMs Are Not Magic, They're Mirrors

Everyone asks whether large language models understand. The more useful question is what they reflect back at us.

LLMs Are Not Magic, They're Mirrors

Everyone keeps asking whether large language models understand. I think that is the wrong question.

The more useful question is what they reflect back at us, and what that reflection tells us about language, tools, and the way we build software.

The useful illusion

A model can produce a remarkably coherent answer without possessing the kind of internal experience we normally associate with understanding. That does not make it useless. It makes it interesting.

The model is often less like a mind and more like a very strange mirror.

The engineering challenge is to learn where the reflection is reliable and where it is distorted.

Comments (2)

Aarav Mehta
The mirror analogy hits home. Every time a prompt produces vague output, it usually reveals that my own specification was fuzzy in the first place.
Elena Rostova
Totally agree on treating LLMs as a lens on language rather than an oracle. Great essay!

Add a comment

Have a reader account? Sign in to save articles and track your discussions.

Get new essays in your inbox

Occasional writing on building, AI, blockchain, and the odd philosophical detour. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.